CW-1996-0007Amritsar, PunjabJudgment 7 August 1996

Amritsar Man v. State of Punjab and Ors.

The Supreme Court, on Paramjit Kaur's habeas petition for her husband [name withheld] abducted on 6 September 1995, ordered a CBI inquiry and then prosecution of the officials on the CBI report, directing Punjab to pay Rs 10 lakh interim compensation recoverable from the officers on conviction. The Court called kidnapping that leaves a family in the dark about whether the victim is alive or dead the worst crime against humanity. The unreported Record of Proceedings is corroborated by the Punjab and Haryana High Court in [name withheld] (2001), which records the date and amount. The officials were later convicted at trial with convictions upheld to the Supreme Court. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.

Externally reportedV2
What this record means

This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →

Report card

By judgment dated 7 August 1996 in Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 497 of 1996, the Supreme Court of India returned findings adverse to 3 police personnel, namely: Senior Superintendent of Police, Tarn Taran Police; Deputy Superintendent of Police, Punjab Police; Deputy Superintendent of Police, Punjab Police, and directed payment of compensation of Rs 10 lakh (Rs 10,00,000).

Register number
PB 02 CW 0004
Case reference
Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 497 of 1996
Court and date
Supreme Court of India, 7 August 1996
Officer(s) at the material time
Senior Superintendent of Police, Tarn Taran Police; Deputy Superintendent of Police, Punjab Police; Deputy Superintendent of Police, Punjab Police
Present service status
Not ascertained from the cited sources.
Provisions invoked
Section 365 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860
Finding of the Court (extract)
“Kidnapping of a person whose family is totally in dark about his whereabouts - even about the fact whether he is alive or dead - is the worst crime against humanity.”
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Adverse finding + compensation. Sentence: compensation only. Compensation: Rs 10 lakh (Rs 10,00,000).
Present status of the proceedings
No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

The Supreme Court of India judgment dated 7 August 1996 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.

Recorded allegations

1
OtherPrimary
Material fact supported

Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.

Official finding: supports allegation.

What the court found

Holding not recorded separately.

“Kidnapping of a person whose family is totally in dark about his whereabouts - even about the fact whether he is alive or dead - is the worst crime against humanity.”

Institutional response

1
7 Aug 1996

Order issued

Concluded
Supreme Court of India External · Binding

The Supreme Court of India recorded adverse findings against police personnel and ordered Rs 1,000,000.

Compensation ordered · Supports allegation (for the compensated wrong only).
Source: Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 497 of 1996
Not yet re-checked.

Follow-up history

1
19 Sep 2026

(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))

Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.

Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.