CW-1992-0004Jajpur, OdishaJudgment 2 April 1992

Jajpur Road Man vs Director General Of Police And Ors.

The judgment of the Orissa High Court records the following account. A Jajpur Road man, accused in a dacoity case, was arrested and brought to Jajpur Road Police Station on 23 August 1990, where police alleged he committed suicide by hanging inside the station latrine at 5:15 AM the next morning. Although a magisterial inquiry accepted the suicide theory, the Orissa High Court analyzed medical evidence—specifically 300 cc of undigested stomach contents contradicting the 9:00 PM feeding time and suspicious haste in cremating the body with police photographing the funeral pyre—and rejected the suicide claim. The High Court concluded that the deceased died due to police torture in custody in clear violation of Article 21. The Court held the State vicariously liable and directed payment of Rs. 30,000 compensation (Rs. 10,000 to the father and Rs. 20,000 to the young widow). Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.

Externally reportedV2
What this record means

This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →

Report card

By judgment dated 2 April 1992, the Orissa High Court (Coram: B.L. Hansaria, K.C. Jagadeb Roy, JJ.) returned findings adverse to the accused police personnel, and directed payment of compensation of Rs 30,000.

Register number
OD 04 CW 0001
Case reference
1992 (I) OLR 565; 1992 CriLJ 2901; 1993 ACJ 259
Court and date
Orissa High Court (Coram: B.L. Hansaria, K.C. Jagadeb Roy, JJ.), 2 April 1992
Officer(s) at the material time
Not identified in the cited sources (Jajpur Road Police Station)
Present service status
Not ascertained from the cited sources.
Provisions invoked
Article 21 of the Constitution of India
Finding of the Court (extract)
“Because of all the above, we would hold that the case of the opposite parties that a Jajpur Road man had died because of suicidal hanging is not acceptable to us. The only other conclusion which can be drawn on …” (at para 11)
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Adverse finding + compensation. Sentence: compensation only. Compensation: Rs 30,000.
Present status of the proceedings
No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

The Orissa High Court judgment dated 2 April 1992 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.

Recorded allegations

1
Custodial deathPrimary
Material fact supported

Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.

Official finding: supports allegation.

What the court found

Holding not recorded separately.

“Because of all the above, we would hold that the case of the opposite parties that a Jajpur Road man had died because of suicidal hanging is not acceptable to us. The only other conclusion which can be drawn on …” (para 11)

Institutional response

1
2 Apr 1992

Order issued

Concluded
Orissa High Court External · Binding

The Orissa High Court recorded adverse findings against police personnel and ordered Rs 30,000.

Compensation ordered · Supports allegation (for the compensated wrong only).
Source: 1992 (I) OLR 565; 1992 CriLJ 2901; 1993 ACJ 259
Not yet re-checked.

Follow-up history

1
19 Sep 2026

(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))

Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.

Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.