CW-1984-0001Bhiwani, HaryanaJudgment 31 January 1984

Bhiwani Man vs [name withheld]

SHO of Police Station City Bhiwani arrested complainant [name withheld] on 3 May 1980 after a gold-smuggling search of his shop and house recovered nothing, and the judgment records that the SHO tortured him in custody to extort money before handing him to Central Excise inspectors who also beat him. The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhiwani, convicted the SHO under Sections 330 and 323 IPC on 17 November 1980 but released him on one year's probation, and both sides' appeals were dismissed by the Additional Sessions Judge. In revision the High Court held that probation had been granted without calling for the Probation Officer's report, in breach of the mandatory Section 4(2) of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958. It left the conviction undisturbed, set aside the probation orders, and remanded the case to the trial court for fresh orders on sentence. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.

Externally reportedV2
What this record means

This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →

Report card

By judgment dated 31 January 1984 in Criminal Revision No. 10 of 1982, the Punjab and Haryana High Court (Coram: B.S. Yadav, J.) affirmed the conviction of the Station House Officer, Police Station City Bhiwani, Haryana Police.

Register number
HR 16 CW 0001
Case reference
Criminal Revision No. 10 of 1982 / (1984) 01 P&H CK 0029
Court and date
Punjab and Haryana High Court (Coram: B.S. Yadav, J.), 31 January 1984
Officer(s) at the material time
Station House Officer, Police Station City Bhiwani, Haryana Police
Present service status
Not ascertained from the cited sources.
Provisions invoked
Section 330 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 323 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 4(2) of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958
Finding of the Court (extract)
“After completion of the trial, the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate convicted the respondent under section 330 and 323 of the Code and gave him benefit of Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 (for short the Act) and released him on probation …” (at para 2)
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Conviction upheld.
Present status of the proceedings
No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

The Punjab and Haryana High Court judgment dated 31 January 1984 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.

Recorded allegations

1
Custodial torturePrimary
Material fact supported

Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.

Official finding: supports allegation.

What the court found

Holding not recorded separately.

“After completion of the trial, the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate convicted the respondent under section 330 and 323 of the Code and gave him benefit of Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 (for short the Act) and released him on probation …” (para 2)

Institutional response

2
Date not established

Conviction

Concluded
Trial court (as recorded in the Punjab and Haryana High Court judgment) External · Binding

The trial court convicted the accused police personnel, as recorded in the Punjab and Haryana High Court judgment.

Conviction · Supports allegation.
Source: (1984) 01 P&H CK 0029
Not yet re-checked.
31 Jan 1984

Order issued

Concluded
Punjab and Haryana High Court External · Binding

The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the convictions of police personnel.

Conviction · Supports allegation (appellate affirmance; trial conviction separate card).
Source: (1984) 01 P&H CK 0029
Not yet re-checked.

Follow-up history

1
19 Sep 2026

(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))

Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.

Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.