CW-1980-0003Alwar, RajasthanJudgment 11 January 1980

State of Rajasthan vs Rajgarh Police Head Constable

The judgment of the Rajasthan High Court records the following account. A Rajgarh man, wanted in a kidnapping case, was detained at Rajgarh police station from 25 June 1965; the SHO, head constable and constable took his cycle, Rs.200 and other articles without entering them in the arrest memo, and the SHO allegedly beat him on the night of 29-30 June to extort more money, leaving 17 contusions. The Special Judge convicted only Head Constable under Section 409 IPC and acquitted the other two. The Division Bench confirmed the 6 months rigorous imprisonment plus Rs.500 fine and ordered his surrender, dismissed the State appeal on conspiracy, hurt and corruption charges for want of evidence, and, the SHO having died, passed no verdict on the beating while deprecating third-degree methods.

Externally reportedV2
What this record means

This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →

Report card

By judgment dated 11 January 1980 in D.B. Criminal Appeal No. 769 of 1972 with S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 535 of 1972, the Rajasthan High Court (Coram: P.D. Kudal, J.) affirmed the conviction of 3 police personnel, namely: Head Constable, Rajgarh Police Station, Alwar; Station House Officer, Rajgarh Police Station, Alwar; Constable, Rajgarh Police Station, Alwar.

Register number
RJ 02 CW 0001
Case reference
D.B. Criminal Appeal No. 769 of 1972 with S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 535 of 1972 / 1980 WLN 17
Court and date
Rajasthan High Court (Coram: P.D. Kudal, J.), 11 January 1980
Officer(s) at the material time
Head Constable, Rajgarh Police Station, Alwar; Station House Officer, Rajgarh Police Station, Alwar; Constable, Rajgarh Police Station, Alwar
Present service status
Not ascertained from the cited sources.
Provisions invoked
Section 409 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860
Finding of the Court (extract)
“There is absolutely no merit in the appeal filed by [name withheld]. The appeal is accordingly dismissed.” (at para 15)
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Conviction upheld. Sentence: imprisonment and fine; maximum substantive term of 0.5 years.
Present status of the proceedings
No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

The Rajasthan High Court judgment dated 11 January 1980 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.

Recorded allegations

1
OtherPrimary
Material fact supported

Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.

Official finding: supports allegation.

What the court found

Holding not recorded separately.

“There is absolutely no merit in the appeal filed by [name withheld]. The appeal is accordingly dismissed.” (para 15)

Institutional response

2
Date not established

Conviction

Concluded
Trial court (as recorded in the Rajasthan High Court judgment) External · Binding

The trial court convicted the accused police personnel, as recorded in the Rajasthan High Court judgment.

Conviction · Supports allegation.
Source: 1980 WLN 17
Not yet re-checked.
11 Jan 1980

Order issued

Concluded
Rajasthan High Court External · Binding

The Rajasthan High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the convictions of police personnel.

Conviction · Supports allegation (appellate affirmance; trial conviction separate card).
Source: 1980 WLN 17
Not yet re-checked.

Follow-up history

1
19 Sep 2026

(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))

Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.

Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.