Date not established
Conviction
ConcludedThe trial court convicted the accused police personnel, as recorded in the Rajasthan High Court judgment.
Conviction · Supports allegation.
Source: (1974) WLN 324
Not yet re-checked.
CW-1974-0002Jaipur, RajasthanJudgment 11 February 1974
Railway Protection Force Sub-Inspector vs The State
The judgment of the Rajasthan High Court records the following account. RPF Sub-Inspector, in charge of the RPF post at Western Railway, Jaipur, demanded Rs 1,000 from shunter a Jaipur man — Rs 500 immediately — as the price for releasing him on bail in railway-property case Crime No. 9 of 1969 in April 1969. The Anti-Corruption Department laid a trap with marked currency, recovered the notes from the appellant's pocket, and the Special Judge, Jaipur convicted him under Section 161 IPC and Section 5(2) read with Section 5(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act 1947, sentencing him to one year's rigorous imprisonment and a Rs 500 fine. The court found both charges proved beyond reasonable doubt, held the sentence was not severe with no mitigating circumstances, dismissed the appeal, cancelled his bail, and directed the District Magistrate, Jaipur to have him arrested to serve the sentence.
Externally reportedV2
What this record means
This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.
How verification works →Detailed record
Report card
By judgment dated 11 February 1974 in Criminal Appeal No. 101 of 1971, the Rajasthan High Court (Coram: K.D. Sharma, J.) affirmed the conviction of the Sub-Inspector, Railway Protection Force Post, Western Railway, Jaipur.
- Register number
- RJ 14 CW 0001
- Case reference
- Criminal Appeal No. 101 of 1971 / (1974) WLN 324
- Court and date
- Rajasthan High Court (Coram: K.D. Sharma, J.), 11 February 1974
- Officer(s) at the material time
- Sub-Inspector, Railway Protection Force Post, Western Railway, Jaipur
- Present service status
- Not ascertained from the cited sources.
- Provisions invoked
- Section 161 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 5(1)(d) read with Section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947
- Finding of the Court (extract)
- “The appeal, therefore, fails and is hereby dismissed. The appellant is on bail. He shall surrender to his bail bonds.” (at para 14)
- Verdict, sentence and quantum
- Conviction upheld. Sentence: imprisonment and fine; maximum substantive term of 1 year.
- Present status of the proceedings
- No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.
Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.
Current position
The Rajasthan High Court judgment dated 11 February 1974 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.
Evidence position
Recorded allegations
OtherPrimary
Material fact supported
Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.
Official finding: supports allegation.
Attributed to the court
What the court found
Holding not recorded separately.
“The appeal, therefore, fails and is hereby dismissed. The appellant is on bail. He shall surrender to his bail bonds.” (para 14)
Separate from verification
Institutional response
11 Feb 1974
Order issued
ConcludedThe Rajasthan High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the convictions of police personnel.
Conviction · Supports allegation (appellate affirmance; trial conviction separate card).
Source: (1974) WLN 324
Not yet re-checked.
Continuing record
Follow-up history
19 Sep 2026
(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))
Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.
Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.