Premises owner in Bareilly jailed under Immoral Traffic Act, granted bail
Police in Bareilly booked a premises owner in Case Crime No. 213 of 2025 under Sections 3, 4, 5, 6 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act. The Allahabad High Court recorded that the applicant had been in jail since 7.6.2025 and granted bail on 26 March 2026. The trial remains pending.
This page records what the cited court records say happened. Findings belong to the court or authority that made them; this register adds none of its own. Names of private individuals are withheld unless a naming gate clears them.
How we verify →Released on bail by the High Court; trial in Case Crime No. 213 of 2025 remains pending.
What happened
The High Court recorded that the bail plea was filed with a prayer to release the applicant in Case Crime No. 213 of 2025 under Sections 3,4,5,6 of the U.P. Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956, registered at Police Station Prem Nagar, District Bareilly.
The High Court recorded that, according to counsel, the applicant was said to be the owner of the premises in which it was alleged that illegal sex trade was being carried out.
The High Court recorded that the applicant was said to be languishing in jail since 7.6.2025 and gave an undertaking not to misuse liberty.
The High Court allowed bail, requiring a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties, with conditions not to tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses and to appear before the trial court.
What the record says
“Applicant is said to be the owner of the premise in which it is alleged that illegal sex trade was being carried out.”
Allahabad High Court, 2026:AHC:66751, para 5 (Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 30054 of 2025) — read the full text
No complaining victim
The only allegation described in the order is paid sex organised at a premises, with no complaining victim, violence, minor, force or fraud mentioned in the order.
What we could not confirm
The order does not give the FIR date or details of the alleged transaction; no allegation of force, minor or complaining victim appears in the order but the full FIR was not examined.